Rethinking Islamic Political Thought in Contemporary Muslim Societies
Main Article Content
Abstract
Contemporary Muslim societies face political transformation involving democracy, citizenship, religious authority, state power, and public ethics. Debates on Islamic politics often remain polarized between formalistic legalism and secular exclusion, making contextual reconstruction necessary. This study aims to formulate a renewed framework of Islamic political thought that connects classical Islamic principles with contemporary civic realities. This research used a qualitative conceptual design with a library research approach. Data were taken from recent peer-reviewed literature on Islamic political thought, maqasid, democracy, citizenship, governance, and public reason. Data collection was conducted through documentation, source selection, thematic classification, and critical reading. Data were analyzed through conceptual analysis and philosophical-hermeneutical interpretation to build a contextual model of Islamic political reasoning. The main finding shows that Islamic political thought needs to move from state-centric legalism toward an ethical-deliberative paradigm based on justice, welfare, plural citizenship, accountability, and non-coercive morality. The study concludes that Islamic political concepts remain relevant when reinterpreted through maqasid-oriented reasoning, democratic participation, and sensitivity to contemporary realities. This article contributes a conceptual model for developing Islamic political discourse that is ethical, inclusive, democratic, and responsive to modern public life.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Addi, L. (2021). The crisis of Muslim religious discourse: The necessary shift from Plato to Kant. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003227076
Barton, G., Yilmaz, I., & Morieson, N. (2021). Religious and pro-violence populism in Indonesia: The rise and fall of a far-right Islamist civilisationist movement. Religions, 12(6), 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12060397
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in reflexive thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
Cesari, J. (2021). We God's people: Christianity, Islam and Hinduism in the world of nations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108767251
Duderija, A. (2023). Islam and gender: Major issues and debates. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003263326
Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
Hadiz, V. R. (2021). Populism and the politics of Islamic identity in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 51(4), 551-573. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2020.1849292
Hassan, M. K., Muneeza, A., & Sarea, A. M. (2022). Islamic social finance and the role of maqasid al-shariah in governance. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 15(5), 879-896. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-02-2021-0077
Haynes, J. (2021). Routledge handbook of religion and politics (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429266222
Ibrahim, A. (2022). Contemporary Islamic governance and the ethics of public interest. Religions, 13(10), 955. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13100955
Laurence, J. (2021). Coping with defeat: Sunni Islam, Roman Catholicism, and the modern state. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691172125.001.0001
Mavelli, L., & Petito, F. (2022). Towards a postsecular international politics of public religions. Review of International Studies, 48(3), 393-414. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000411
Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044
Morieson, N. (2021). Religion and the populist radical right: Secular Christianism and populism in Western Europe. Vernon Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1zjg3s2
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hrobjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Saeed, A. (2021). Human rights and Islam: An introduction to key debates between Islamic law and international human rights law. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784716588
Wagemakers, J. (2022). The Muslim Brotherhood: Ideology, history, descendants. Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463727686
Yilmaz, I., & Morieson, N. (2021). A systematic literature review of populism, religion and emotions. Religions, 12(4), 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12040272
Yilmaz, I., & Morieson, N. (2023). Civilizational populism in democratic nation-states. Religions, 14(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020154