The Historical Dynamics of Islamic Civilization in the Formation of Political Institutions, Power, and the Development of the Islamic World Civilization

Main Article Content

Ahsan Hakim
Heri Rifhan Halili
Febry Suprapto
Babussalam

Abstract





This study aims to analyze the historical dynamics of Islamic civilization in the formation of political institutions, the construction of power, and the development of the broader Islamic world. It is motivated by the academic need to understand Islamic politics not merely as a normative system or as a debate over state forms, but as a historical process that continuously changed in response to the social, cultural, economic, and geopolitical contexts of Muslim societies. This research employs a qualitative approach through library research. The data were obtained from primary and secondary sources related to Islamic civilization, Islamic political thought, the caliphate, imamate, sultanate, political legitimacy, bureaucracy, and the role of political institutions in advancing Islamic knowledge and culture. The data were analyzed using a historical-conceptual approach involving data condensation, thematic categorization, interpretation, and conceptual synthesis. The findings show that Islamic political institutions developed through four major patterns: normative-prophetic, institutional-administrative, dynastic-territorial, and civilizational-pluralistic. These patterns demonstrate that power in Islamic history was not based solely on religious legitimacy, but also on the ability to build political stability, administrative structures, legal systems, economic networks, military organization, and socio-intellectual relations. The study concludes that Islamic civilization was formed through a dialectical relationship between values, institutions, power, and civilizational production. Its main contribution lies in proposing a historical-institutional framework for understanding Islamic political history in a more critical, integrative, and contextual way.





Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Afsaruddin, A. (2008). The first Muslims: History and memory. Oneworld Publications.

Afsaruddin, A. (2013). Striving in the path of God: Jihad and martyrdom in Islamic thought. Oxford University Press.

Black, A. (2011). The history of Islamic political thought: From the Prophet to the present (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Donner, F. M. (2010). Muhammad and the believers: At the origins of Islam. Harvard University Press.

Gutas, D. (1998). Greek thought, Arabic culture: The Graeco-Arabic translation movement in Baghdad and early ‘Abbāsid society. Routledge.

Hodgson, M. G. S. (1974). The venture of Islam: Conscience and history in a world civilization (Vols. 1–3). University of Chicago Press.

Ilhamni, I., Meirison, M., & Nazar, Z. (2022). Islamic political thought and its implementation in the contemporary world. Islamadina: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 23(1), 47–61. doi: 10.30595/islamadina.v23i1.10715

Jong, A., & Ali, R. (2023). Political Islam as an incomplete and contested category: A post-foundationalist revision. Religions, 14(8), Article 980. doi: 10.3390/rel14080980

Kennedy, H. (2016). The caliphate: The history of an idea. Basic Books.

Lapidus, I. M. (2014). A history of Islamic societies (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Zaman, M. Q. (2020). Political power, religious authority, and the caliphate in eighteenth-century Indian Islamic thought. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 30(2), 313–340. doi: 10.1017/S135618632000022X