Family Resilience in Online Tahfidz Learning During Haze Pollution Crises: A Vygotskian Theoretical Perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
Haze pollution associated with vegetation and peatland fires can disrupt face-to-face instruction and intensify the difficulties of sustaining Qur’anic memorisation (tahfidz), an activity requiring regular recitation, murājaʿah (revision), corrective feedback and motivation. This article develops an integrative conceptual account of how family resilience may support online tahfidz learning during such disruptions. An integrative, purposive review of 27 DOI-identified scholarly publications was organised around Qur’anic education, emergency remote learning, family resilience, sociocultural assistance, and environmental disruption. Sources were compared through a transparent concept-by-evidence matrix and interpreted using Walsh’s family-resilience framework and the Vygotskian concepts of the zone of proximal development and scaffolding. The synthesis suggests three connected mechanisms: family adaptation establishes feasible routines and mobilises resources; parent–teacher–learner interaction maintains pedagogical and emotional communication; and calibrated scaffolding provides modelling, feedback and progressively withdrawn assistance. A proposed framework distinguishes enabling conditions, educational practices and hypothesised outcomes, while recognising inequalities in connectivity, parental time and instructional competence. The evidence supports conceptual plausibility rather than demonstrating effectiveness in haze-affected tahfidz households, because no primary field data were collected. The article contributes a crisis-responsive model that can inform the design of home–school collaboration and subsequently be tested with families, teachers and students in affected areas.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Al Mazrooei, A. K., Almaki, S. H., Gunda, M., Alnoor, A., & Sulaiman, S. M. (2023). A systematic review of K-12 education responses to emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Review of Education, 68(6), 811–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-023-09986-w
Banson, J. (2022). Co-regulated learning and online learning: A systematic review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), Article 100376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100376
Carrión-Martínez, J. J., Pinel-Martínez, C., Pérez-Esteban, M. D., & Román-Sánchez, I. M. (2021). Family and school relationship during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), Article 11710. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111710
Cortés-Albornoz, M. C., Ramírez-Guerrero, S., García-Guáqueta, D. P., Vélez-Van-Meerbeke, A., & Talero-Gutiérrez, C. (2023). Effects of remote learning during COVID-19 lockdown on children’s learning abilities and school performance: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Development, 101, Article 102835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102835
Doo, M. Y., Bonk, C. J., & Heo, H. (2020). A meta-analysis of scaffolding effects in online learning in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4638
Edisherashvili, N., Saks, K., Pedaste, M., & Leijen, Ä. (2022). Supporting self-regulated learning in distance learning contexts at higher education level: Systematic literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 792422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.792422
Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075
Faza, A., & Lestari, I. A. (2025). Self-regulated learning in the digital age: A systematic review of strategies, technologies, benefits, and challenges. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v26i2.8119
Furlong, D. E., & Lester, J. N. (2023). Toward a practice of qualitative methodological literature reviewing. Qualitative Inquiry, 29(6), 727–738. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004221131028
Gayatri, M., & Irawaty, D. K. (2022). Family resilience during COVID-19 pandemic: A literature review. The Family Journal, 30(2), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807211023875
Giantara, F., Yanti, N., Handayani, S., & Anis, Y. (2020). Pola pendidikan keluarga saat bencana kabut asap di Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v4i2.446
Haryanto, B., Kurniasari, F., Trihandini, I., Nugraha, F., Widayana, N. G., & Winarni, N. L. (2026). Climate change adaptation to smoke haze for improved child health in Southeast Asia: Analysis situation in Palembang, Indonesia. Annals of Global Health, 92(1), Article 52. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.5211
Jayachandran, S. (2009). Air quality and early-life mortality: Evidence from Indonesia’s wildfires. Journal of Human Resources, 44(4), 916–954. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.44.4.916
Kaltsum, L. U., & Muhammad, A. S. (2022). Pembelajaran tahfidz Al-Qur’an virtual di UIN Jakarta dan IIQ Jakarta. Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat, 21(1), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v21i1.27016
Knopik, T., Błaszczak, A., Maksymiuk, R., & Oszwa, U. (2021). Parental involvement in remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic—Dominant approaches and their diverse implications. European Journal of Education, 56(4), 623–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12474
Maimaiti, G., Hew, K. F., & Xiao, Y. (2025). Challenges to parental engagement in K–12 online learning during the pandemic: Lessons learned and a tripartite model for future involvement. Future in Educational Research, 3(3), 482–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/fer3.70007
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sufihara, I., & A’isah, A. (2025). Memorizing the Qur’an in the digital era: Santri learning engagement through online tahfidz programs. Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 11(1), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.19109/tadrib.v1i1.30680
Susanto, S., Desrani, A., & Zamani, D. A. (2021). Learning tahfidz Al-Qur’an during the COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 18(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2021.182-03
Tetlow, S., Wallace, C., Thomas, M., Filipponi, T., Pontin, D., & Livingstone, A. (2024). A systematic review of the use of the concept family resilience in interventions with families with children and young people. Public Health Nursing, 41(2), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13287
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Walsh, F. (1996). The concept of family resilience: Crisis and challenge. Family Process, 35(3), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1996.00261.x
Walsh, F. (2003). Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice. Family Process, 42(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00001.x
Wen, Y., Gwendoline, C. L. Q., & Lau, S. Y. (2021). ICT-supported home-based learning in K-12: A systematic review of research and implementation. TechTrends, 65(3), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00570-9
Yadav, D. (2022). Criteria for good qualitative research: A comprehensive review. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31, 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00619-0
Yates, J., & Mantler, T. (2023). The resilience of caregivers and children in the context of COVID-19: A systematic review. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-022-00514-w
Zuo, M., Kong, S., Ma, Y., Hu, Y., & Xiao, M. (2023). The effects of using scaffolding in online learning: A meta-analysis. Education Sciences, 13(7), Article 705. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070705