Digital Business Sustainability: Integration of Technological Innovation and Sharia Economic Ethics

Main Article Content

Emilta Friska Juniar
Trisna Trihapsari
Reza Hilmy Luayyin
Galang yoga Perwira
Muqaffi Abdillah

Abstract

Digital business transformation creates opportunities to improve efficiency, expand access, and generate value, yet it also introduces tensions between economic growth, social justice, and environmental responsibility. Islamic economic ethics offers a normative foundation for directing technology toward stakeholder well-being. This study aims to examine the conditions under which technological innovation supports digital business sustainability, clarify the role of Islamic ethics in governance, and develop an operational integrative framework. A qualitative conceptual approach is employed through critical examination and synthesis of literature on digital business models, sustainability, and Islamic economic ethics. The analysis compares arguments and findings, distinguishes normative claims from empirical evidence, and identifies relationships among concepts. The synthesis indicates that technology’s contribution to sustainability depends on alignment among digital capabilities, business model configurations, and oversight mechanisms. Formal Sharia compliance alone is insufficient to demonstrate the achievement of ethical objectives without evaluating the distribution of benefits and social and environmental impacts. The study proposes a framework linking digital innovation capabilities, governance grounded in justice, trustworthiness, and public welfare, and multidimensional sustainability outcomes. Proposed indicators include service transparency, user protection, inclusive access, and environmental responsibility. This framework advances an understanding of sustainability as value creation requiring ethical direction and provides a basis for evaluating digital business practices. However, the relationships among its components remain conceptual propositions requiring empirical validation across sectors and institutional contexts.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Broccardo, L., Zicari, A., Jabeen, F., & Bhatti, Z. (2023). How digitalization supports a sustainable business model: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, 122146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122146

George, G., Merrill, R. K., & Schillebeeckx, S. J. D. (2021). Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship: How digital innovations are helping tackle climate change and sustainable development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 999–1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719899425

Gregori, P., & Holzmann, P. (2020). Digital sustainable entrepreneurship: A business model perspective on embedding digital technologies for social and environmental value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122817

Hudaefi, F. A. (2020). How does Islamic fintech promote the SDGs? Qualitative evidence from Indonesia. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 12(4), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-05-2019-0058

Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0

Mergaliyev, A., Asutay, M., Avdukic, A., & Karbhari, Y. (2021). Higher ethical objective (Maqasid al-Shari’ah) augmented framework for Islamic banks: Assessing ethical performance and exploring its determinants. Journal of Business Ethics, 170, 797–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04331-4

Muryanto, Y. T. (2023). The urgency of sharia compliance regulations for Islamic Fintechs: A comparative study of Indonesia, Malaysia and the United Kingdom. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(5), 1264–1278. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-05-2022-0099

Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Hönigsberg, S., Weritz, P., Wache, H., Mittermeier, F., Tana, S., Dang, D., Hautala-Kankaanpää, T., & Pekkola, S. (2025). The relationship of digital transformation and corporate sustainability: Synergies and tensions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 210, 123809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123809

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Palmié, M., Aebersold, A., Oghazi, P., Pashkevich, N., & Gassmann, O. (2025). Digital-sustainable business models: Definition, systematic literature review, integrative framework and research agenda from a strategic management perspective. International Journal of Management Reviews, 27(3), 346–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12380

Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), O1–O16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695

Sauer, P. C., & Seuring, S. (2023). How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: A guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions. Review of Managerial Science, 17, 1899–1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3

Trittin-Ulbrich, H., Scherer, A. G., Munro, I., & Whelan, G. (2021). Exploring the dark and unexpected sides of digitalization: Toward a critical agenda. Organization, 28(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420968184