The Influence of Gadget Use on Moral Development: A Systematic Literature Review
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to identify, analyze, and synthesize empirical findings concerning the influence of gadget use on the moral development of children and adolescents, based on reputable Scopus-indexed studies published within the past decade. The method employed is a systematic literature review utilizing the PRISMA approach, encompassing the selection of relevant empirical studies quantitative, qualitative, and longitudinal that examine variables related to gadget use, psychological processes such as empathy, self-regulation, and moral disengagement, as well as prosocial and antisocial behaviors. The results of the synthesis indicate that the impact of gadget use is neither direct nor linear; rather, it is moderated by factors such as duration of use, type of content consumed, digital literacy, parenting style, and the broader social environment. Moderate use accompanied by dialogic parental mediation has the potential to strengthen digital ethical literacy and promote prosocial behavior. Conversely, excessive use without supervision and exposure to negative content are associated with decreased empathy, heightened moral disengagement, and a greater propensity toward antisocial behavior.
Article Details
References
Boer, M., Stevens, G. W. J. M., Finkenauer, C., & van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M. (2020). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms, social media use intensity, and social media use problems in adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49, 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01132-0
Bussey, K., Fitzpatrick, S., & Raman, A. (2015). The role of moral disengagement and self-efficacy in cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.954045
Coyne, S. M., et al. (2017). Does media violence predict violent behavior? Developmental Psychology, 53(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000238
George, M. J., & Odgers, C. L. (2015). Seven fears and the science of how mobile technologies may be influencing adolescents. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 832–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615596788
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A meta-analysis of cyberbullying research. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
Odgers, C. L., & Jensen, M. R. (2020). Annual research review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61(3), 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13190
Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2017). A large-scale test of the Goldilocks hypothesis. Psychological Science, 28(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616678438
Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents. Preventive Medicine Reports, 12, 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.003
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2017). Social media use and adolescent well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.004
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Odgers, C. L., & Jensen, M. R. (2020). Annual research review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61(3), 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13190
Elsaesser, C., Russell, B., Ohannessian, C. M., & Patton, D. (2017). Parenting in a digital age: A review of parents’ role in preventing adolescent cyberbullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35, 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.06.004
George, M. J., & Odgers, C. L. (2015). Seven fears and the science of how mobile technologies may be influencing adolescents in the digital age. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 832–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615596788
Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., Helsper, E. J., Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Veltri, G. A., & Folkvord, F. (2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12277
Nathanson, A. I. (2015). Media and the family: Reflections and future directions. Journal of Children and Media, 9(1), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.997146
Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2017). A large-scale test of the Goldilocks hypothesis. Psychological Science, 28(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616678438
Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being. Preventive Medicine Reports, 12, 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.003
Valkenburg, P. M., Meier, A., & Beyens, I. (2022). Social media use and adolescent well-being: An updated review. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.017
Bussey, K., Fitzpatrick, S., & Raman, A. (2015). The role of moral disengagement in cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.954045
Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., et al. (2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12277
Elsaesser, C., et al. (2017). Parenting in a digital age. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35, 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.06.004
Valkenburg, P. M., Meier, A., & Beyens, I. (2022). Social media use and adolescent well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.017