Differentiated Instruction For Enhancing Literacy And Numeracy At SD Muhammadiyah Plus Probolinggo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64540/42c8tq74Keywords:
Differentiated learning, literacy; numeracy, basic education, Muhammadiyah schools, adaptive learningAbstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of differentiated learning in improving students' literacy and numeracy in SD Muhammadiyah Plus Probolinggo. The research uses a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were collected through classroom observation, semi-structured interviews with teachers and students, and open-ended questionnaires, then analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. The results showed that differentiated learning was implemented through four main mechanisms, namely identification of students' learning readiness, differentiation of learning processes, adjustment of literacy and numeracy activities, and provision of formative feedback on an ongoing basis. Teachers used diagnostic assessments and observation of student development as the basis for determining the difficulty level of tasks, flexible grouping, scaffolding forms, and enrichment. In literacy learning, differentiation is carried out through variations in the difficulty level of text, vocabulary, and question types, while in numeracy learning it is carried out through variations in the complexity of the problem, the use of concrete media, visual representation, and gradual support in problem solving. The findings also show that differentiation contributes to students' learning engagement, confidence, independence, reading comprehension, and problem-solving ability. The novelty of this research lies in the conceptualization of differentiated learning as an adaptive pedagogical system that links student needs mapping, instructional decisions, and formative evaluation cyclically in the context of Islamic basic education. This research provides practical implications for teachers and schools in designing literacy and numeracy learning that is more responsive to student diversity.
Downloads
References
Bi, M., Struyven, K., & Zhu, C. (2024). Differentiated instruction in Chinese primary and secondary schools: A systematic literature review. ECNU Review of Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311241265126
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
de Ruig, N. J., de Jong, P. F., & Zee, M. (2023). Stimulating elementary school students’ self-regulated learning through high-quality interactions and relationships: A narrative review. Educational Psychology Review, 35, Article 71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09795-5
Fong, C. J., Patall, E. A., Snyder, K. E., Hoff, M. A., Jones, S. J., & Zuniga-Ortega, R. E. (2023). Academic underachievement and its motivational and self-regulated learning correlates: A meta-analytic review of 80 years of research. Educational Research Review, 41, 100566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100566
Grecu, Y. V. (2023). Differentiated instruction: Curriculum and resources provide a roadmap to help English teachers meet students’ needs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125, 104064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104064
Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., Vantieghem, W., & Gheyssens, E. (2020). Exploring the interrelationship between Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Differentiated Instruction (DI): A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 29, 100306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100306
Hu, L. (2024). Utilization of differentiated instruction in K–12 classrooms: A systematic literature review (2000–2022). Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(2), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09931-y
Kahmann, R., Droop, M., & Lazonder, A. W. (2022). Meta-analysis of professional development programs in differentiated instruction. International Journal of Educational Research, 116, 102072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102072
Kahmann, R., Droop, M., & Lazonder, A. W. (2024). Dutch elementary school teachers’ differentiation practices during science and technology lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 145, 104626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104626
Kalinowski, E., Westphal, A., Jurczok, A., & Vock, M. (2024). The essential role of teacher self-efficacy and enthusiasm for differentiated instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 148, 104663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104663
Karst, K., Bonefeld, M., Dotzel, S., Fehringer, B. C. O. F., & Steinwascher, M. (2022). Data-based differentiated instruction: The impact of standardized assessment and aligned teaching material on students’ reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 79, 101597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101597
Langelaan, B. N., Gaikhorst, L., Smets, W., & Oostdam, R. J. (2024). Differentiating instruction: Understanding the key elements for successful teacher preparation and development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 140, 104464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104464
Martin, A. J. (2023). Integrating motivation and instruction: Towards a unified approach in educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 35, Article 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09774-w
Puzio, K., Colby, G. T., & Algeo-Nichols, D. (2020). Differentiated literacy instruction: Boondoggle or best practice? Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 459–498. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933536
Wutich, A., Beresford, M., & Bernard, H. R. (2024). Sample sizes for 10 types of qualitative data analysis: An integrative review, empirical guidance, and next steps. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241296206
Ziernwald, L., Hillmayr, D., & Holzberger, D. (2022). Promoting high-achieving students through differentiated instruction in mixed-ability classrooms—A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(4), 540–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X221112931








