Reconstruction Of Contemporary Educational Epistemology Through Integration Of Knowledge And Values As The Basis For Holistic Human Formation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64540/drve4005Keywords:
Educational Epistemology, Integration Of Knowledge And Values, Holistic Education, Humanization Of Education, Integrative ParadigmAbstract
Social transformation, the advancement of digital technology, and changes in the global structure of knowledge have brought education into a new epistemological phase that requires the integration of knowledge, values, and humanity. This study aims to analyze and reconstruct contemporary educational epistemology through the integration of knowledge and values as the foundation for the development of holistic human beings. The main issue examined concerns the dominance of positivistic and instrumental paradigms, which tend to perceive knowledge as an object that can be technically measured, while ethical, social, and humanistic dimensions are often marginalized. This research employs a qualitative approach using the library research method through a philosophical-critical review of various literatures on educational epistemology, critical theory, humanistic education, constructivism, and the complexity paradigm. The analysis is conducted using a philosophical hermeneutic approach and conceptual analysis to identify the relationships between knowledge, values, experience, and action within educational practices. The findings indicate that education cannot be understood merely as a process of information transmission or technical competency development but must be directed toward the formation of individuals with reflective, moral, social, and transformative capacities. This study proposes the concept of the Integrative-Humanistic Epistemological Model, which connects epistemic, axiological, humanistic, and transformational dimensions as the foundation of future education. This model positions values not as an additional element, but as a fundamental component in the process of knowledge formation, utilization, and transformation. The contribution of this research provides a theoretical framework for the development of curricula, pedagogical approaches, and educational policies oriented toward the formation of holistic human beings who are capable of critical thinking, ethical action, and responsibility toward global change.
Downloads
References
Biesta, G. (2022).World-centred education: A view for the present. Routledge.
Carney, S. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Comparative Education, 58(4), 568–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2022.2102326
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Freire, P. (2021). Pedagogy of the Oppressed (50th Anniversary Edition). Bloomsbury Academic.
Guillemin, E. (2025). Biesta’s world-centred education: Subjectification revisited? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 59(2), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhaf009
Illeris, K. (2022).Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning Theorists in Their Own Words (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003250036
Jandric, P., Hayes, S., Truelove, I., & MacKenzie, A. (2023). Postdigital Science and Education: A Philosophical Perspective on Education in the Age of Digital Transformation. Postdigital Science and Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00391-1
Jandric, P., & Knox, J. (2022). The postdigital turn: Philosophy, education, research. Policy Futures in Education, 20(7), 833–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103211062713
Jandric, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2022). Postdigital science and education. Postdigital Science and Education, 4, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00219-7
Juvonen, S., Rautiainen, M., & Kallio, J. (2024). Conceptualizing socialization, qualification, and subjectification: Revisiting Biesta’s educational purposes. Educational Theory, 74(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12652
Kirylo, J. D., & Naicker, I. (2022). Critical pedagogy in uncertain times: Reimagining education for social transformation. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(10), 1575–1587. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.2012748
Kivunja, C. (2022). Distinguishing between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework in qualitative research. International Journal of Higher Education, 11(2), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v11n2p44
Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., & Khait, V. (2023). Developing Epistemic Cognition Through Education: The Role of Reflection and Critical Inquiry. Educational Psychologist, 58(3), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2205728
Mertens, D. M. (2023). Transformative research and evaluation: Social justice perspectives in educational inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231154321
Nussbaum, M. C. (2020). The Cosmopolitan Tradition: A Noble but Flawed Ideal. Harvard University Press.
Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2021). Qualitative Research: Bridging the Conceptual, Theoretical, and Methodological. SAGE Publications.
Schleicher, A. (2023).Education and Skills for the Future: Building Human Capabilities in a Changing World. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264300002-en
Schunk, D. H. (2023).Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective (9th ed.). Pearson.
Selwyn, N. (2024). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates (4th ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Shahjahan, R. A., Estera, A. L., & Surla, K. (2023). Decolonizing educational research and practice: Toward epistemic justice in higher education. Higher Education, 86, 1235–1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01022-9
Snyder, H. (2023). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 162, 113746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113746
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in Education: A Tool on Whose Terms? UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385723
Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2022). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI education research. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(4), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2052473
Zhang, W., & Cui, L. (2024). Constructivist Learning Environments and Knowledge Construction in Contemporary Education: A Systematic Review. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 11245–11268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12456-8
Zhao, Y. (2021). Build back better: Avoid the learning loss trap. ECNU Review of Education, 4(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120985804








