Navigating Educational Transformation: The Response of SMK DKV Nurul Qarnain to the Age of Artificial Intelligence and Policy Dynamics
Main Article Content
Abstract
Recent shifts in national education policy, particularly under the new government, have brought notable implications for vocational schools. Simultaneously, the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) continues to reshape teaching and learning practices across the country. SMK Desain Komunikasi Visual Nurul Qarnain, situated within a traditional Islamic boarding school, is one of the institutions facing the challenge of navigating these dual pressures. This research employed a qualitative approach, involving in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis. The findings indicate that the school grapples with structural limitations, including limited access to digital resources and state policies that prioritize efficiency and market alignment. Nevertheless, the institution has begun adjusting its curriculum and teaching methods, integrating AI tools selectively to support student creativity. The study reveals the capacity of such schools to develop value-based forms of adaptation that align with local needs and offer insights for more inclusive and responsive educational policy design.
Article Details
References
Apple, M. W. (2001). Educating the “Right” Way: Markets, Standards, God, and Inequality. Routledge. Bappenas. (2024). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) 2025–2029.
Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Bappenas. https://www.bappenas.go.id/files/rpjmn-2025-2029.pdf
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age. W. W. Norton & Company.
DeepMind, O. and G. (2023). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence: Collaborative Research Insights.
OpenAI & Google DeepMind Joint Publication. https://openai.com/research/frontiers-ai- collaboration
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum.
Howlett, M. (2019). Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. Routledge.
Institute, M. G. (2023a). The Economic Potential of Generative AI: The Next Productivity Frontier.
McKinsey & Company.
Institute, M. G. (2023b). The Economic Potential of Generative AI. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/reports/economic-potential-of-generative-ai
Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Peta Jalan Pendidikan Indonesia 2020–2035. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/peta-jalan-pendidikan-2035
Keuangan, K. (2025). Outlook Anggaran Pendidikan 2025. Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/media/anggaran-pendidikan-2025
Manovich, L. (2013). Software Takes Command. Bloomsbury.
Media, T. (2023). Global AI Index 2023. Tortoise Media Intelligence Unit. https://www.tortoisemedia.com/intelligence/global-ai-index-2023
OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 Technical Report. OpenAI.
Orr Robin, K. and U. (2020). Hybrid Institutional Models and the Future of Vocational Education.
Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 72(3), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1738616
RI, D. P. R. (2022). Risalah Sidang Rapat Kerja Komisi X tentang Pendidikan Vokasi. Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. https://www.dpr.go.id/risalah/komisi-x-vokasi-2022
Risko & Gilbert, S. J., E. F. (2016). Cognitive Offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002
UNESCO. (2021). Education for the Future: Technical and Vocational Outlook. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000378403